Hillary Clinton May Challenge US Election Results


Hillary Clinton is being urged by a group of prominent computer scientists and election lawyers to call for a recount in three swing states won by Donald Trump.

According to The New York, the group, which includes voting-rights attorney John Bonifaz and J. Alex Halderman, the director of the University of Michigan Center for Computer Security and Society, believes they’ve found persuasive evidence that results in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania may have been manipulated or hacked.

Also See: Prayers of Christian Americans ‘Reversed’ My Prophecy On U.S. Election – TB Joshua

Although the group is not speaking to the media about their findings, it has focused on lobbying the Clinton team in private to challenge the election results.

The activists last Thursday held a conference call with Clinton campaign chairman, John Podesta and campaign general counsel, Marc Elias to make their case.

The academics presented findings showing that in Wisconsin, Clinton received 7 percent fewer votes in counties that relied on electronic-voting machines compared with counties that used optical scanners and paper ballots.

US Election Update

Based on this statistical analysis, Clinton may have been denied as many as 30,000 votes; she lost Wisconsin by 27,000. While it’s important to note the group has not found proof of hacking or manipulation, they are arguing to the campaign that the suspicious pattern merits an independent review — especially in light of the fact that the Obama White House has accused the Russian government of hacking the Democratic National Committee.

The Clinton camp is running out of time to challenge the election, because according to one of the activists, the deadline in Wisconsin to file for a recount is Friday; in Pennsylvania, it’s Monday; and Michigan is next Wednesday.

Also See: Presidency Denies Donating $500m To Hilary Clinton’s Campaign

Thus, whether Hillary Clinton will call for a recount remains unclear. The academics so far have only a circumstantial case that would require not just a recount but a forensic audit of voting machines.